For content agencies, editorial teams & writers

The content brief that makes revision loops redundant

A structured briefing form for every writing job: keyword, audience, tone of voice, required sources, internal links, no-gos. The client completes it before you write a single line.

Create briefing form

1-2 revision loops saved per article when the brief is complete before writing starts

Why copy really fails

The one-line brief

"Write something on heat pumps, about 1,200 words." No keyword, no audience, no distinction from the five articles already on the blog. The writer guesses — and inevitably guesses wrong.

Nobody budgets for revision loops

"Actually we wanted it more technical" — after delivery. Every loop costs the writer unpaid hours and the agency margin and deadline. The text wasn't the problem — the missing brief was.

Briefing info scattered across five channels

The keyword is in an email, the tone came via Slack, the source links at some point by phone. At ten articles a month nobody knows which version counts — and onboarding new writers starts from zero every time.

One briefing standard for every job

  1. 1

    Define the briefing structure once

    Build your content brief as a form: working title, focus keyword and search intent, audience and their knowledge level, tone (with example link), required sources, internal links, length, deadline, no-gos. AI-drafted in 30 seconds.

  2. 2

    The client completes it — fully

    One form run per article: one question per screen, required fields for keyword and audience, file upload for style guides and raw material. "Don't know" no longer gets lost — it becomes visible before writing starts.

  3. 3

    The writer writes once — correctly

    Every brief arrives complete and uniformly structured, emailed to the writer and archived in the dashboard. Queries drop, the first draft lands, and new freelancers work to the same standard from day one.

Built for editorial workflows

File upload

Style guide, persona PDF, product datasheets — material sits with the brief, not in a third tool.

Conditional logic

SEO fields only for SEO copy, product questions only for product content — the brief stays as short as possible.

Answer piping

"Which question should the article on {keyword} answer?" — the form thinks along and feels like an editorial chat.

Draft saving

Clients can pause the brief and gather sources before submitting — without starting over.

Email notification

A completed brief lands instantly in the editor's or writer's inbox — no dashboard polling needed.

GDPR + DPA

Briefs with client internals stay on German servers — with an Art. 28 DPA for your compliance chain.

Cheaper than half a revision loop

Free to start (3 forms, 100 responses/month). Pro at €12/month (€9/month annually): unlimited forms, your own branding, AI included — no €80 SEO suite required.

Free

3 forms, 250 responses/month

Pro

Unlimited, 10,000 responses/month, AI included

Questions from editorial practice

What belongs in a good content brief?
Minimum: focus keyword with search intent, audience and their prior knowledge, desired tone (ideally with a link to an example text), core message in one sentence, required sources, internal links, length and deadline. Hugely underrated: no-gos — competitors that mustn't be named, claims legal forbids. Those gaps are exactly what cause loops two and three.
My client won't complete a form — will they?
They will, if the benefit is clear: "10 minutes of briefing saves you two revision rounds" is a deal clients understand. One-per-screen and draft saving lower the barrier, and with your branding (Pro) the form reads as a professional process step — not offloaded work. Many agencies simply make it a prerequisite: no brief, no slot in the content calendar.
Why not just a Google Docs template?
The Docs template is the status quo that creates the problem: fields get deleted, half-completed or "let's do it by phone". A form with required fields enforces completeness, conditional logic hides the irrelevant, and every brief sits uniformly structured and searchable in the dashboard instead of in 30 docs with 30 formats.
How is this different from Surfer or Frase?
Surfer and Frase analyse SERPs and generate SEO outlines — they answer "what ranks?". Questee solves the other, upstream problem: "what does the client actually want?" — audience, tone, no-gos, sources. Many teams use both; for pure brief capture you don't need an €80 suite, just a good form for €12.
Are client internals in the brief secure?
Briefs often contain the unpublished: product launches, positioning strategy, raw data. Questee hosts exclusively in Germany, transfers encrypted and isolates data per tenant. As an agency you get the Art. 28 GDPR DPA — important because you're a processor for your own clients and can list Questee cleanly as a sub-processor.
Does this work from the writer's side too?
Yes — as a freelance writer you flip it: send your clients your briefing form as a fixed part of your process. It positions you as a pro, "just write something" jobs turn into clean briefs, and every sign-off discussion has a documented brief as reference.
Can I pass briefs into my editorial tool?
Via webhook: every submitted brief fires an HTTP call with all answers, which you connect to your content-calendar tool or an automation. Plus email notification and export. We deliberately don't promise native one-click integrations with Asana, Trello etc. — the webhook is the honest, universal route.

The next first draft lands first time

Generate the briefing form with AI, adapt it to your editorial process, send the link to your client. Start free.