For litigation practices

Secure witness memories before they fade

Months pass between the accident, breach or incident and the court date. The digital questionnaire captures the memory while it is fresh — structured, in the witness's own words, as a working basis for your trial preparation.

Start for free
See features

The problem with witness memory

Memory has an expiry date

After mere weeks, sequences, times and exact wording blur. By the evidentiary hearing — often more than a year later — "he said verbatim" has become "I think, roughly". What is not captured early is lost.

Informal emails instead of structure

"Just write down what you saw" yields half a page of prose — no times, no positions, none of the questions that matter procedurally. The gaps only show once the witness is hard to reach.

Preparation under deadline pressure

Shortly before the hearing the firm phones witnesses to reconstruct the basics — months too late. By then the conversation shapes the memory more than it retrieves it. An early, neutral self-account would have been the better foundation.

How Questee captures memory early

  1. 1

    Set up a neutral questionnaire

    You structure the questionnaire around your procedural needs: who, when, where, what exactly, in what order, who else was present? Open questions, neutrally worded — the witness describes in their own words, without suggestion. Sketches or photos come as uploads.

  2. 2

    The witness answers promptly and calmly

    The link goes out right after the incident. The witness completes the form when they have time and quiet — one question per screen, on phone or computer, with save-and-resume. No scheduling, no travel, no law-office intimidation factor.

  3. 3

    You prepare the hearing with substance

    Months later, the early memory record sits in front of you, structured: timelines, positions, verbatim accounts. You see the strengths and weaknesses of the testimony before the hearing and decide on solid grounds which witnesses to name.

Built for careful fact work

One per screen

One question at a time keeps the witness in narrative flow — no overwhelming walls of fields.

Save and resume

Remembering needs breaks — the witness can pause and continue via the same link.

Photo & sketch upload

Accident photos, location sketches or screenshots uploaded right alongside the account.

Conditional logic

Follow-ups only when relevant: whoever confirms direct line of sight gets the detail questions.

Password protection

The form is only accessible with the code the firm gives the witness personally.

Hosted in Germany

Testimony content GDPR-compliant on German servers, DPA included — no US cloud.

A fraction of what lost evidence costs

Free to try (3 forms). Pro for litigation practice: unlimited forms, firm branding, AI included — €12/month, €9/month billed annually.

Free

3 forms, 250 responses/month

Pro

Unlimited, 10,000 responses/month, AI included

View all plans

Questions from litigation practice

Does the form replace witness examination in court?
No — the form is your firm's internal working tool for establishing the facts and preparing for hearings. Examination is conducted by the court. How you deploy the early memory record procedurally is your professional decision; its primary value is that you know the strengths, weaknesses and gaps of an account before offering the evidence.
How do I avoid leading questions in the form?
You word every question yourself — open W-questions without embedded assumptions work best: "What did you observe?" rather than "Did you see the red car speeding?". Because the witness answers in writing, alone and without conversational pressure, the account is often less influenced than in an interview. Professional responsibility for questioning technique stays with you.
Are the witnesses' statements stored securely?
Yes — encrypted transfer, tenant-isolated storage on servers in Germany, optional password protection and an Art. 28 GDPR DPA. Testimony content can be highly sensitive; that is why Questee deliberately avoids US cloud infrastructure. Only your firm has access, and you can delete responses after transferring them to the file.
Will witnesses actually cooperate?
Far more readily than with an office appointment: no travel, no scheduling, fill it in on the sofa on a Sunday evening. The framing in your cover note matters — the witness is helping someone they usually know (the client is a neighbour, colleague, business partner) with 15 minutes of structured recollection. The barrier is as low as voluntary cooperation allows.
For which case types is the questionnaire worthwhile?
Wherever much time passes between incident and hearing and perception matters: traffic accidents (sequence, positions, light phases), employment law (statements in HR meetings, harassment chronology), construction law (condition at acceptance), neighbour and tenancy disputes (noise logs, incidents). You create one template per case type and duplicate it per matter.
Why not just an email with a list of questions?
Because email replies come back unstructured: three questions answered, four skipped, all in one paragraph. A form walks through each question individually, enforces required details like date and time, takes photos along and files every answer against the right field. And the account does not sit in a mailbox, but encrypted on German servers.
Can the witness add to their statement later?
Any time before submitting — thanks to save-and-resume, they can complete the form over several days. After submission the response is closed; for additions you send a new link or a short follow-up form. Having the earlier and later versions documented separately is not a flaw — it is actually useful when assessing how the memory evolved.

Capture the next witness memory this week — not next year

Set up the questionnaire, send the link to the witness, fresh memory record in the file. Free to try, no contract.

Try it free now